Addressing Dog Attack Cases: 640 Toronto Interview with a Personal Injury Lawyer

Interview Summary

After a woman suffered serious injuries during a dog attack in Toronto earlier this year, many people have questioned the legal consequences of such an incident.

Is the owner of the dog responsible for the physical and mental rehabilitation of the injured party? How are damages awarded to those who have been injured and now face a different quality of life?

James Fireman, an Ontario disability and personal injury lawyer and National practice leader at Samfiru Tumarkin LLP, spoke to John Oakley on 640 Toronto to answer these questions and more.

Interview Notes

• Legislation in Ontario regarding dog attacks: The Dog Owners Liability Act implements strict liability. In strict liability, the injured party has to prove that the individual they are filing a suit against owned the dog that caused the injuries.
• The distinction between liability and criminal negligence: While there is the potential for criminal negligence in some instances, it is not always the case with personal injury lawsuits. It is always an owner’s responsibility to ensure their dogs do not cause harm to others, regardless of whether or not the breed of the dog is prohibited.
• Pursuing legal damages after an attack: The extent of the injuries and impact on an individual’s life will influence the damages awarded to an injured party. It is important to consider whether or not the injured individual provoked the dog or had any responsibility for the incident.