“End of the Line for Ignace Township”: Employment Lawyer Jon Pinkus with Canadian Press

Interview Summary

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed a critical appeal by Ignace Township.

Out of legal options, the northwestern Ontario municipality must now pay a former employee whose employment contract was cut short.

Jon Pinkus, a Toronto employment lawyer and Partner at Samfiru Tumarkin LLP, spoke with Mike Stimpson, a local journalism initiative reporter at Thunder Bay Source, about why the appeal is significant.

Interview Notes

• Court’s decision: Pinkus confirmed it’s “the absolute end of the line for the township” in this case — clarifying that the municipality “can file no further appeals.”
• Impact on employment law: Pinkus explained that this decision reinforces that employers can’t terminate employees when they see fit: “The municipality sought to challenge that principle, and the Supreme Court did not agree to hear that, which means that a lower-court decision on that issue remains good law.” He reiterated the importance of this decision, stating: “This is now the second time that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused to hear an appeal of the Waksdale decision, which is a very significant decision from 5 years ago.”
• Appeals court ruling: Pinkus commented on the initial ruling of the appeals court regarding the unenforceable termination clause. “In light of the fact that the termination clause in this case was so clearly illegal based on such longstanding, well-settled principles that have been enunciated so many times by lower courts and appellate courts.”

Related Resources

For further insights and discussions related to employee rights and trial wins, explore the following resource:

• Ignace Township loses appeal at Ontario Court
• Dufault v. Ignace (Township)